Details on todays orders
The Court granted one case today, Chaidez v. United States.
Every post published in April 2012, most recent first.
The Court granted one case today, Chaidez v. United States.
Chief Justice Roberts recently threw fuel on the fire of the perennial debate about the practical value of law review articles when he stated that, as a general matter, law reviews are not particularly helpful for practitioners and judges.
The weekend’s coverage continued to focus on last week’s oral arguments in Arizona v. United States, the federal challenge to Arizona immigration law S.B. 1070.
With the help of our reporter, Lyle Denniston, we will be live blogging as orders are issued today. The Live Blog window is below the jump. Once you see the window and our initial welcome, we ask that you do not refresh your browser. Updates will appear without the need for refreshing.
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to settle a dispute among lower courts on whether to give more immigrants the benefit of a ruling that requires their lawyers to advise them more clearly on what can happen if they plead guilty to a crime.
On Monday the Court granted one new case. The Court did not call for the views of the Solicitor General in any new cases. We do not expect any opinions this week. The next Conference is scheduled for May 10. Our list of “Petitions to watch” for that Conference will be available soon.
The Oyez Project at Chicago-Kent has posted audio and transcripts of this week’s oral arguments. The Court heard arguments this week in: RadLAX Gateway Hotel v. Amalgamated Bank Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band v. Patchak Arizona v. United States
Wednesday’s oral argument in Arizona v. United States – the federal challenge to S.B. 1070, Arizona’s immigration law – remains the main subject of Court-related news.
On Tuesday, April 24, the Court heard arguments in Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak, consolidated with Salazar v. Patchak.
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. United States, the federal government’s challenge to Arizona’s aggressive efforts to reduce the number of illegal immigrants in that state. (I previewed the case for the blog in Plain English earlier that day.)