Thursday round-up
Parsing Brown v. EMA and the campaign-finance decision, the nine best dissents of the Term, and the Justices at the Aspen Idea Festival.
Every post published in June 2011, most recent first.
Parsing Brown v. EMA and the campaign-finance decision, the nine best dissents of the Term, and the Justices at the Aspen Idea Festival.
Personnel changes at the blog
The Court has just finished a Term in which its tendency to decide cases more broadly than necessary — an activist inclination — appeared to deepen.
On Monday, the Court issued its decision in Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown and J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro.
The Term ended on Monday with opinions in the violent video games and campaign finance cases, as well as two others in cases about the procedural concept of personal jurisdiction.
The Court grants two new cases; more discussion of Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association; October Term 2010 retrospectives.
John Elwood reviews the Court’s June 27 and 28 order lists.
A federal appeals court, the first at its level to rule, upholds the new health insurance purchase mandate, but does so only by a thin margin that leaves the provision open to later challenges if the law actually goes into effect in 2014.
The Court issues (among others) its long-awaited decision in the violent video games case, as well as a decision on Arizona’s campaign-finance laws.
The Court refuses to hear a major case seeking to impose constitutional limits on class-action lawsuits. In a round of orders issued during its last public session of the Term, it sets 11 new cases for decision at its next Term.