This week at the Supreme Court: In Plain English
This post discusses the opinion in AT&T v. Concepcion, as well as the denial of cert. in Virginia v. Sebelius. It also discusses the value of oral argument.
Every post published in April 2011, most recent first.
This post discusses the opinion in AT&T v. Concepcion, as well as the denial of cert. in Virginia v. Sebelius. It also discusses the value of oral argument.
In AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, the Court held that states cannot require class proceedings to be available in arbitration.
The NInth Circuit refuses to decide a dispute on public access to the videotape of the Proposition 8 trial on same-sex marriage, instead referring it to a District judge. UPDATE THURSDAY: Federal judge sets a hearing on the issue.
An interview with retired Justice Stevens; the lack of retirement rumors this spring; more on AT&T v. Concepcion
The D.C. Circuit Court supports the Obama Administration view that Congress has not sought to ban all use of federal funds for any form of research on human embryos.
On Tuesday, the Court issued its opinion in United States v. Tohono O’odham Nation.
Audio recordings of this week’s oral arguments are now available.
On Monday, the Court heard argument in McNeill v. United States.
The AT&T v. Concepcion decision and the final oral argument of the Term.
On April 25, the Court heard oral argument in Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co.