Skip to main content

April 2007 Archive

Every post published in April 2007, most recent first.

Showing 1 - 10166 Results

Today at the Supreme Court: 4/30/07

The Court is scheduled to issue regular orders at 10 AM eastern and is also likely to release one or more opinions at that time. We will have coverage of both as soon as possible after they are made public.

ByJason Harrow/Apr 30, 2007

Today’s Orders and Opinions

Today’s Order List is here. There were five opinions today: The opinion in KSR v. Teleflex is here. Microsoft v. AT&T is here. United Hauler’s is here. Scott v. Harris is here. The Court has also posted a video along with its decision here (Real Video). EC Term of Years Trust is here.

ByJason Harrow/Apr 30, 2007

News Round-Up: Today’s Orders & Opinions

The AP’s Pete Yost has this article reporting that the Court ruled in favor of Microsoft, limiting the reach of U.S. patents abroad; Peter Kaplan of Reuters reports here on the opinion in Microsoft Corp. v. AT&T (No. 05-1056).

ByGretchen Sund/Apr 30, 2007

Let’s Go to the Videotape!

In today’s Fourth Amendment decision about running a fleeing car off the road, there is a factual dispute about exactly what happened, and the Court notes that because the case is in a summary judgment posture, ordinarily it would accept the plainitiff’s version of the facts for purposes of the

ByMarty Lederman/Apr 30, 2007

Court turns down Hamdan appeal, will hear Medellin

UPDATED 11:36 a.m. The Supreme Court on Monday denied review of the latest Guantanamo Bay appeal, involving two prisoners who face war crimes trials before “military commissions.” Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David H. Souter voted to hear the joint appeal of Salim Ahmed Hamdan and Omar Ahmed Khadr, but it takes the votes of four to grant review.

ByLyle Denniston/Apr 30, 2007

Analysis: A flat new rule on high-speed chases

Though two Justices tried hard in separate opinions to ease the impact of the Supreme Court’s rulng Monday on high-speed police chases, the fact remains that the main opinion had the unqualified support of six Justices and did lay down a hard-and-fast constitutional rule.

ByLyle Denniston/Apr 30, 2007
12...17

Welcome to SCOTUSblog

Tell us a bit about yourself so we can tailor what you see. You can update these any time in your account.