Skip to content
Newsletter

SCOTUStoday for Friday, February 27

Carved details along top of Supreme Court building are pictured
(Katie Barlow)

We’re thrilled to introduce the first in a series of animated videos, done in partnership with Briefly, on some of the most important upcoming cases of the current term. This first video is an introduction to United States v. Hemani. Watch it here.

Week in Review

The court heard four arguments this week, during the first half of the February sitting. Here are the links to SCOTUSblog’s coverage.

And on Tuesday and Wednesday, the court released opinions in four argued cases: The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist, U.S. Postal Service v. Konan, Villarreal v. Texas, and The GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal.

  • In Hain, the court unanimously affirmed the vacatur of a district court judgment due to lack of jurisdiction.
  • In Konan, the court held that the USPS cannot be sued over intentionally misdelivered mail.
  • In Villarreal, the court held that a trial court did not err when it allowed a defendant to meet with his lawyers during an overnight break in testimony but barred them from “managing” his ongoing testimony.
  • In GEO Group, the court held that a government contractor cannot immediately appeal an order rejecting its immunity claim.

At the Court

On Thursday, the Trump administration asked the court on its interim relief docket to allow it to remove protected status from Syrian nationals. For more on the case, see the On Site section below.

Today, the justices will meet in a private conference to discuss cases and vote on petitions for review. Orders from that conference are expected on Monday at 9:30 a.m. EST.

On Monday, the court will hear argument in United States v. Hemani, on whether a federal statute that prohibits gun possession by users of illegal drugs violates the Second Amendment. Find Amy’s case preview in the On Site section.

We will be live blogging the Hemani argument on Monday beginning at 9:30 a.m. EST.

Morning Reads

FedEx Says It Could Return Any Money From Tariff Refunds to Customers

Tony Romm, The New York Times

Days after it sued the federal government for tariff refunds, FedEx announced that it plans to return any tariff payments it recovers “to customers who bore the brunt of those charges,” according to The New York Times. “With its announcement this week, the shipper appears to be the first large business to signal it would share any refunds it obtains from tariffs, which some companies have sought to abate over the past year by raising their prices.”

How the tariffs ruling could complicate Trump’s next Supreme Court nomination

W. James Antle III, Washington Examiner

When the Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s signature tariffs, just one of his appointees was in dissent: Justice Brett Kavanaugh. That fact looms large in the current debate over potential Supreme Court retirements, according to the Washington Examiner, and explains why Trump may prefer for Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito (who dissented with Kavanaugh in the tariffs case) to remain on the court. “Trump risks ending up with a less-aligned justice, even if he fills the seat with a proven legal conservative, since Thomas and Alito are his most supportive members of the court.”

Trump wants to end affirmative action. Here’s how he plans to do it.

Jessica Guynn, USA Today

In January, the Trump administration filed a lawsuit against Minnesota, claiming that its “efforts to fight discrimination in the civil service” by requiring state agencies to pursue a diverse workforce “are themselves discriminatory,” according to USA Today. The lawsuit is part of a broader push against affirmative action that has benefitted from a number of recent court rulings, including the Supreme Court’s decision “in 2023 that colleges’ consideration of race as a factor in student admissions was unconstitutional.” “The Supreme Court left us with a weird legal landscape in which affirmative action in higher education was unlawful but affirmative action in the workplace was technically lawful,” said NYU School of Law’s David Glasgow to USA Today. “With this new Minnesota lawsuit, that could change.”

Prosecutor claims that delayed charges against Abrego Garcia were ‘extraordinary’ but justified

Travis Loller, Associated Press

At a Thursday hearing, First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee Rob McGuire testified about his decision to charge Kilmar Abrego Garcia with human smuggling last year after he rose to national prominence for being mistakenly deported to El Salvador. After the deportation, “the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the Trump administration had to work to bring him back,” according to the Associated Press. Abrego Garcia has argued that the human smuggling charges are “vindictive” and were pushed by Trump administration officials who were angry about having to facilitate his return. On Thursday, McGuire acknowledged that it’s unusual for more than two years to pass between a traffic stop and charges being filed, as was the case for Abrego Garcia, but added that the charges are “based on the evidence” and that “he had not previously been aware of the stop.”

The Postal Service's Recent Supreme Court Win Is Bad News for Government Accountability

Damon Root, Reason

In a column for Reason, Damon Root reflected on the Supreme Court’s Tuesday ruling in favor of the federal government in a case on misdelivered mail, in which the court held that a federal law protecting the U.S. Postal Service from lawsuits over lost or miscarried mail bars lawsuits over mail that was intentionally not delivered. Root explained why he believes the decision deepened a government accountability crisis. “Federal officials already enjoy far too much immunity from being sued over their misconduct. This ruling just added to that problem,” he wrote.

On Site

From the SCOTUSblog Team

Trump administration asks justices to allow it to remove protected status from Syrian nationals

The Trump administration on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to freeze a ruling by a federal judge in New York which indefinitely postpones the termination of a program allowing Syrians to live in the United States temporarily.

Statue in front of the Supreme Court
Case Preview

Court to hear argument on whether and when drug users may possess firearms

The court will hear argument on Monday in the second gun-rights case of the term. In January, the Trump administration supported Hawaii gun owners in their challenge to a state law requiring them to obtain express permission from the owners of private property before bringing guns onto that property. But on Monday, the administration will be asking the justices to allow it to prosecute a Texas man on charges that he violated a federal law prohibiting users of illegal drugs from having a gun.

The US Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on December 4, 2022.
Relist Watch

Beach blasts and unusually dangerous weapons

In his Relist Watch column, John Elwood highlighted newly relisted petitions addressing the Air Force’s disposal of hazardous munitions on a beach in Guam and Connecticut’s ban on semi-automatic rifles.

relist watch banner art lien
Opinion Analysis

Court rules criminal defendants may be prohibited from discussing ongoing testimony with counsel during an overnight recess

The Supreme Court on Wednesday unanimously ruled that, when a trial court recesses a criminal trial during a defendant’s testimony, the court may order the defendant and his lawyer not to discuss that testimony during the break except when it is incidental to discussions of trial strategy or whether to accept a plea bargain.

Washington, DC - October 7 : Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group photo following the recent addition of Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, at the Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill on Friday, Oct 07, 2022 in Washington, DC. Bottom row, from left, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts, Associate Justice Samuel Alito, and Associate Justice Elena Kagan. Top row, from left, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Opinion Analysis

Court rejects ICE contractor’s right to immediate appeal

Wednesday’s opinion in The GEO Group v. Menocal rejects the efforts of a contractor for ICE to get an immediate appeal from a district court judgment, explaining that the contractor must wait until after a trial in the district court to bring the case to the appellate court.

The U.S. Supreme Court is shown on April 25, 2022 in Washington, DC.
Contributor Corner

How can the Supreme Court protect electoral integrity?

In his Justice, Democracy, and Law column, Edward Foley reflected on the possibility that President Donald Trump will order the federal seizure of ballots after this year’s midterms, prompting a major legal battle. The court should prepare now “to act proactively,” Foley contended, “so as to avoid electoral subversion that can’t be remedied after it has occurred.”

Carvings are shown at the top of the Supreme Court building

Podcasts

Advisory Opinions

The Immunity Episode

Sarah Isgur and David French dive deep into the world of immunities, examining recent Supreme Court decisions and their implications.

SCOTUS Quote

MR. MITCHELL: “[T]he question presented asks whether an offer of complete relief renders the case –”

JUSTICE BREYER: “I’m not interested at the moment in the question asked. I am interested in the question I am asking.”

— Justice Stephen Breyer in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez

Recommended Citation: Kelsey Dallas and Nora Collins, SCOTUStoday for Friday, February 27, SCOTUSblog (Feb. 27, 2026, 9:00 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/02/scotustoday-for-friday-february-27/