Skip to content

Ohio v. Brinkman

Petition for certiorari denied on February 22, 2022

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
21-603 Ohio N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2021

Issue: (1) Whether the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits review of the entire record to determine whether a guilty plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered; and (2) whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari to resolve the conflict among the courts on whether the failure to strictly adhere to the advisement of rights in Boykin v. Alabama should result in the automatic reversal of a guilty plea.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
10/19/2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 26, 2021)
11/09/2021Brief amicus curiae of Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association filed.
11/10/2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 26, 2021 to December 23, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
11/12/2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 23, 2021.
12/23/2021Brief of respondent George Brinkman in opposition filed.
12/23/2021Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent George Brinkman.
01/11/2022Reply of petitioner Ohio filed. (Distributed)
01/12/2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
02/22/2022Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
02/22/2022Petition DENIED.