Skip to content

Filson v. Tarango

Petition for certiorari denied on April 24, 2017

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
16-1000 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2016

Issue: (1) Whether allegations of extraneous juror contact arising post-verdict can compel a trial court to question a juror about his subjective mindset in addressing the possibility of any prejudice; and (2) whether an external contact with the jury requires a court to apply a presumption of prejudice, whether or not the contact was intentional, involved in a verbal communication, concerns a matter pending before the jury, or whether or not the court even knows what actually transpired.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
12/01/2016Application (16A549) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 15, 2016 to February 13, 2017, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
12/07/2016Application (16A549) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until February 13, 2017.
02/13/2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 20, 2017)
03/20/2017Brief of respondent Manuel Tarango, Jr. in opposition filed.
03/20/2017Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Manuel Tarango, Jr.
03/20/2017Brief amici curiae of Michigan and Nine other States filed.
04/03/2017Reply of petitioners Timothy Filson, Warden, et al. filed.
04/05/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 21, 2017.
04/24/2017Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
04/24/2017Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.