In its Conference of February 26, 2016, the Court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether a stun gun is an “arm” within the meaning of the Second Amendment; whether the California Unclaimed Property Law violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it deprives owners of their property without affording constitutionally adequate notice; and whether the Full Faith and Credit Clause permits a court to deny recognition to an adoption judgment previously issued by a court from a sister state, based on the forum court’s de novo determination that the issuing court erred in applying its own state’s adoption law.
NB: In keeping with the Court’s ongoing trend toward granting certiorari on those cases which have been relisted from a prior conference, henceforth “Petitions to watch” will highlight only those cases. The “Petition of the day” feature will now feature petitions that Tejinder Singh concludes warrant highlighting.
[PAGE]14-10008[/PAGE]
[PAGE]14-10078[/PAGE]
[PAGE]14-10186[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-169[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-195[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-478[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-580[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-584[/PAGE]
[PAGE]15-648[/PAGE]
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY