Monday round-up

With the Court still in recess, some commentary on the Court focuses on the upcoming arguments in the challenges to the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate, which are now only a little over a month away.  At Balkinization, Marty Lederman discusses the briefs filed recently by Hobby Lobby and the federal government, highlighting both “one important common ground . . . [and] one fundamental difference” in the parties’ positions.  And in an op-ed for The Hill, Dorinda Bordlee – who filed an amicus brief in support of the challengers in the case – criticizes another amicus brief (which Lyle covered for this blog) which contends that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act is unconstitutional, suggesting that the argument “is ultimately a distraction.” 

Briefly:

Send us your links!  Since last summer, we have relied on our readers to send us links to articles, blog posts, and commentary on the Court.  If you have a link that you would like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup@scotusblog.com.  Thank you! 

Disclosure: Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents.

Posted in: Everything Else

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY