Round-Up: Today’s Orders & Opinions

In the Wall Street Journal, Mark H. Anderson and Michael A. Pollock report here (subscription req’d) on today’s opinions in Bell Atlantic and Winkelman and the Court’s decision to review Kentucky Department of Revenue v. Davis, a municipal bond case. Reuters has this article on the Bell Atlantic v. Twombly decision; Greg Stohr of Bloomberg reports here on the ruling, which places new limits on antitrust lawsuits; and the AP’s Pete Yost has this report.

Stohr also has this article on the Winkelman ruling, which allows the parents of a disabled child to go to court without a lawyer’s assistance; Mark Sherman reports here for the Associated Press; and Sam Bagenstos has this post at Disability Law discussing the IDEA case.

The AP also has this article on the Hinck v. U.S. ruling, giving the U.S. Tax Court exclusive jurisdiction to review IRS refusals to reduce interest payments; at TaxProf Blog, Paul Caron weighs in here on the opinion giving the Tax Court exclusive jurisdiction.

At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has this post on the Court’s decision in Los Angeles County v. Retelle, a summary reversal of the Ninth Circuit. Here, at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the Supreme Court’s dismissal of Roper v. Weaver; Doug Berman weighs in here at Sentencing Law and Policy. Ross Runkel summarizes today’s five opinions and the summary reversal in this post at the Supreme Court Times blog.

In addition, Stohr reports here on the Court’s decision to review states’ power to tax the interest on other states’ municipal bonds for Bloomberg; Peter Lattman weighs in here on the Kentucky municipal bond case at the WSJ.com Law Blog; Caron has this post on today’s grant in Davis at the TaxProf Blog; and the AP has this report.

Lastly, Anderson has this article (subscription req’d) in the Wall Street Journal on the Court’s decision to seek the Solicitor General’s views in the Wyeth v. Levine drug-labeling case.