United States v. Haymond

Pending petition
Docket No.
Op. Below
Argument
TBD
Opinion
TBD
Vote
TBD
Author
TBD
Term
TBD

Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit erred in holding “unconstitutional and unenforceable” the portions of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(k) that required the district court to revoke the respondent’s 10-year term of supervised release, and to impose five years of reimprisonment, following its finding by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent violated the conditions of his release by knowingly possessing child pornography.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Apr 03 2018Application (17A1065) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 16, 2018 to May 16, 2018, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Apr 04 2018Application (17A1065) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until May 16, 2018.
May 03 2018Application (17A1065) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until June 15, 2018.
May 03 2018Application (17A1065) to extend further the time from May 16, 2018 to June 15, 2018, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Jun 15 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 16, 2018)
Jun 28 2018Motion of Andre Ralph Haymond for an extension of time not accepted for filing (corrected version submitted). (June 29, 2018)
Jun 28 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 16, 2018 to August 15, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
Jun 29 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 15, 2018.
Aug 07 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 15, 2018 to September 14, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
Aug 13 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 14, 2018.
Sep 13 2018Brief of Andre Ralph Haymond in opposition submitted.

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY