Enter your email address to subscribe to updates to this case:
          

Tibble v. Edison International

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
13-550 9th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD OT 2014

Issue: Whether a claim that ERISA plan fiduciaries breached their duty of prudence by offering higher-cost retail-class mutual funds to plan participants, even though identical lower-cost institution-class mutual funds were available, is barred by 29 U.S.C. § 1113(1) when fiduciaries initially chose the higher-cost mutual funds as plan investments more than six years before the claim was filed.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Oct 30 2013Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 2, 2013)
Nov 15 2013Waiver of right of respondents Edison International, et al. to respond filed.
Nov 26 2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 13, 2013.
Dec 9 2013Response Requested . (Due January 8, 2014)
Dec 12 2013Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 7, 2014.
Feb 7 2014Brief of respondents Edison International, et al. in opposition filed.
Feb 21 2014Reply of petitioners Glenn Tibble, et al. filed.
Feb 26 2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 21, 2014.
Mar 3 2014Supplemental brief of petitioners Glenn Tibble, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 20 2014Letter of March 20, 2014, from counsel for respondents received. (Distributed)
Mar 24 2014The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Aug 15 2014Letter of August 15, 2014, from counsel for respondents received.
Aug 19 2014Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
Sep 3 2014Supplemental brief of respondents Edison International, et al. filed.
Sep 10 2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.
Oct 2 2014Petition GRANTED limited to the following question: "Whether a claim that ERISA plan fiduciaries breached their duty of prudence by offering higher-cost retail-class mutual funds to plan participants, even though identical lower-cost institution-class mutual funds were available, is barred by 29 U. S. C. §1113(1) when fiduciaries initially chose the higher-cost mutual funds as plan investments more than six years before the claim was filed." .
Oct 30 2014The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including December 2, 2014.
Oct 30 2014The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including January 16, 2015.
Oct 30 2014Petitioners' will file their reply brief on the merits on or before February 13, 2015.
Nov 6 2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
Nov 24 2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.
Dec 2 2014Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
Dec 2 2014Brief of petitioners Glenn Tibble, et al. filed.
Dec 9 2014Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
Dec 9 2014Brief amicus curiae of Cambridge Fiduciary Services LLC filed.
Dec 9 2014Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed.
Dec 9 2014Brief amicus curiae of Pension Rights Center filed.
Dec 9 2014Brief amicus curiae of AARP filed.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards