Issue: Whether, when a state court cites and applies the correct standard from Batson v. Kentucky for assessing whether a petitioner has established a prima facie case of discrimination in jury selection, the court’s use of other terminology in a sentence
addressing a distinct point render its Batson analysis “contrary to” this Court’s precedent for the purposes of determining whether the
federal courts must defer to the state adjudication under 28 U.S.C. §2254(d)(1).
On Monday the Court granted five new cases and issued four opinions in argued cases. The archived Live Blog is here.
On Thursday the Justices will meet for their May 23 Conference. Our list of “Petitions to watch” for that Conference is here.
Bloomberg Law and SCOTUSblog’s Supreme Court Challenge
Current Standings - Top 5 Teams
1. The Silent Ts
Georgetown University Law Center
1. Ninos Angels
George Washington University Law School
1. Protect Sam Chase
St. Johns University School of Law
1. Bro Bono
Indiana University -Bloomington, Maurer School of Law
5. Motion to Strike
Cornell University Law School
Click here to learn more