South Carolina v. Samuel

Pending petition
Docket No.
Op. Below
Argument
TBD
Opinion
TBD
Vote
TBD
Author
TBD
Term
TBD

Issue: Whether the South Carolina Supreme Court erred when it held, in conflict with many federal courts of appeals, that a trial court may not deny a criminal defendant’s motion to represent himself based on the “defendant’s improper motive or unethical conduct.”

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Aug 23 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 24, 2018)
Sep 17 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 24, 2018 to October 24, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
Sep 24 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 24, 2018
Oct 15 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 24, 2018 to November 23, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
Oct 18 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 23, 2018.

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY