Shoop v. Hill

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
18-56 6th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit properly used Moore v. Texas, a Supreme Court decision from 2017, to find that an Ohio court unreasonably applied Atkins v. Virginia in 2008, despite the Ohio court’s reliance on the clinical judgments of experts to find that Hill was not intellectually disabled.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Jul 06 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2018)
Jul 27 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 9, 2018 to August 30, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
Jul 31 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 30, 2018.
Aug 29 2018Brief of respondent Danny Hill in opposition filed.
Aug 29 2018Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Danny Hill.
Sep 10 2018Reply of petitioner Tim Shoop, Warden filed.
Sep 12 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
Oct 09 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
Oct 22 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
Oct 29 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
Nov 05 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
Nov 13 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
Term Snapshot