Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

This week the blog will publish a multi-part online symposium on United States v. Texas, a challenge by Texas and twenty-five states to the Obama administration's deferred-action policy for immigration. Contributions to this special feature, as well as an “explainer” by this blog's Lyle Denniston, are available here.

Schwab v. Reilly

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
08-538 3rd Cir. Nov 3, 2009
Tr.
Jun 17, 2010 6-3 Thomas OT 2009

Holding: Someone who files for bankruptcy is allowed to retain the value of certain property that would otherwise be sold to pay her debts, up to a certain dollar limit. If the debtor initially declares that the property is worth less than that limit, but it turns out that the property is worth more than the limit, the trustee administering the bankruptcy process can keep the money above the limit for the creditors, even if the trustee did not object initially when the debtor first declared the property's value.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas on June 17, 2010. Justice Ginsburg dissented, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Breyer.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs

Amicus Briefs

Certiorari-stage documents

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards