Price v. Thomas

Petition for certiorari denied on March 4, 2013
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-658 11th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2012

Issue: (1) Whether, when the state court failed to consider the cumulative prejudicial effect of many, related inadequacies of trial counsel because it unreasonably concluded that one of counsel’s failures did not constitute deficient performance, the federal habeas court should review the prejudice prong of the petitioner’s claim de novo, and without being limited to the state habeas record; and (2) whether the court of appeals’ sua sponte affirmance on the basis of a non-jurisdictional and curable pleading deficiency that was waived by the state is consistent with Wood v. Milyard .

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
Sep 12 2012Application (12A271) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 1, 2012 to October 31, 2012, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Sep 20 2012Application (12A271) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until October 31, 2012.
Oct 18 2012Application (12A271) to extend further the time from October 31, 2012 to November 21, 2012, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Oct 22 2012Application (12A271) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until November 21, 2012.
Nov 21 2012Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 27, 2012)
Nov 21 2012Appendix of Christopher Lee Price filed.
Dec 11 2012Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 28, 2013.
Jan 28 2013Brief of respondent Kim T. Thomas, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections in opposition filed.
Feb 12 2013Reply of petitioner Christopher Lee Price filed.
Feb 13 2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 1, 2013.
Mar 4 2013Petition DENIED.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards