Minneci v. Pollard
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-1104 | 9th Cir. |
Nov 1, 2011 Tr.Aud. |
Jan 10, 2012 | 8-1 | Breyer | OT 2011 |
Holding: Because state tort law authorizes adequate alternative damages actions in this case, no Bivens remedy can be implied.
Judgment: Reversed, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on January 10, 2012. Justice Scalia wrote a separate concurring opinion, which was joined by Justice Thomas, but also joined the Court’s opinion. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Argument recap: Bivens hurdle too high
- Argument preview: A new Bivens remedy?
- New curb on Bivens remedy?
Briefs and Documents
Merits Briefs for the Petitioners Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners Merits Briefs for the Respondents Amicus Briefs in Support of the RespondentsCertiorari-stage documents
- Opinion below (9th Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari
- Amicus brief of DRI