Kurns v. Railroad Friction Products Corp.

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
10-879 3d Cir. Nov 9, 2011
Tr.Aud.
Feb 29, 2012 6-3 Thomas OT 2011
 
Share:

Holding: Petitioners’ state-law design-defect and failure-to-warn claims fall within the field of locomotive equipment regulation pre-empted by the Locomotive Inspection Act, as that field was defined in Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

Plain English Summary:

Judgment: Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on February 29, 2012. Justice Kagan filed a concurring opinion. Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, which Justices Ginsburg and Breyer joined.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs for Petitioners Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners Merits Briefs for the Respondents Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents Certiorari-stage Documents The supplemental briefs in this case make reference to the Solicitor General's brief in Crane v. Atwell, which is available here.    
Term Snapshot
Awards