Greene v. Fisher
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-637 | 3d Cir. |
Oct 11, 2011 Tr.Aud. |
Nov 8, 2011 | 9-0 | Scalia | OT 2011 |
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the petitioner in this case.
Holding: For purposes of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, “clearly established federal law” is limited to the Supreme Court’s decisions “as of the time of the relevant state-court adjudication on the merits.”
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia on November 8, 2011.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Opinion analysis: The Court quickly disposes of “Twilight Zone” habeas arguments
- Argument recap: Arguing in the Twilight Zone is no easy task
- Argument preview: Journey to the Twilight Zone: When does a state’s obligation to consider "clearly established” law end?
Briefs and Documents
Merits Briefs for the Petitioner
Amicus Briefs for the Petitioner
Merits Briefs for the Respondent
Amicus Briefs for the Respondent
Certiorari-stage documents
- Brief in opposition (unavailable)





