Gonzalez v. Thaler

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
10-895 5th Cir. Nov 2, 2011
Tr.Aud.
Jan 10, 2012 8-1 Sotomayor OT 2011

Holding: Section 2253(c)(3) is a mandatory but nonjurisdictional rule. The failure of a certificate of appealability to “indicate” a constitutional issue does not deprive a court of appeals of jurisdiction to adjudicate the appeal. Moreover, for a state prisoner who does not seek review in a state’s high­est court, the judgment becomes “final” for purposes of Section 2244(d)(1)(A) upon “expiration of the time for seeking such review.” The petitioner’s appeal in this case was therefore untimely.

Judgment: Affirmed, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on January 10, 2012. Justice Scalia filled a dissenting opinion.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs For the Petitioner

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioner

Merits Briefs for the Respondent

Certiorari-stage documents

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards