Descamps v. United States
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11-9540 | 9th Cir. |
Jan 7, 2013 Tr.Aud. |
TBD | TBD | TBD | OT 2012 |
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the NACDL as amicus curiae in this case.
Issue: Whether, in a case under the Armed Career Criminal Act, when a state crime does not require an element of the federal crime of burglary, the federal court may find the existence of that element by examining the record of the state proceedings under the "modified categorical approach.”
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Argument recap: Court struggles with classifying prior burglary convictions across states and courtrooms
- Argument preview: When is a burglary a “burglary”?
- Court grants two more cases
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| Mar 19 2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 27, 2012) |
| Apr 18 2012 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 29, 2012. |
| May 21 2012 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including June 28, 2012. |
| Jun 28 2012 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
| Jul 12 2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 24, 2012. |
| Jul 17 2012 | Supplemental brief of petitioner Matthew Robert Descamps filed. (Distributed) |
| Aug 31 2012 | Motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. |
| Sep 11 2012 | Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner Matthew Robert Descamps. |
| Oct 3 2012 | Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 26, 2012. |
| Oct 5 2012 | The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 24, 2012. |
| Oct 5 2012 | The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 3, 2012. |
| Oct 18 2012 | Motion to file volume II of the joint appendix under seal filed by petitioner Matthew Robert Descamps. |
| Oct 24 2012 | Joint appendix filed. (Volume 1 of 2) (Statement of costs filed) |
| Oct 24 2012 | Brief of petitioner Matthew Robert Descamps filed. |
| Oct 29 2012 | Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioner GRANTED. Dan B. Johnson, Esquire, of Spokane, Washington, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner. |
| Oct 29 2012 | Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 20, 2012. |
| Oct 31 2012 | SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, January 7, 2013. |
| Oct 31 2012 | Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed. |
| Nov 16 2012 | CIRCULATED. |
| Nov 26 2012 | Motion to file volume II of the joint appendix under seal GRANTED. |
| Dec 3 2012 | Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed) |
| Dec 5 2012 | Record recieved from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit. (1 box). |
| Dec 5 2012 | Record from U.S.D.C. for Eastern District of Washingon is electronic. There is 1 sealed envelope received from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit) that is a part of U.S.D.C. record. |
| Dec 27 2012 | Reply of petitioner Matthew Robert Descamps filed. (Distributed) |
| Jan 7 2013 | Argued. For petitioner: Dan B. Johnson, Spokane, Wash. (Appointed by this Court.) For respondent: Benjamin J. Horwich, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. |





