Editor's Note :

Editor's Note :

There is a possibility of opinions at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, March 1. We will begin live-blogging at 9:45 a.m.
On Wednesday the court hears oral argument in Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. Nevils. Ronald Mann has our preview.

Daimler AG v. Bauman

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
11-965 9th Cir. Oct 15, 2013
Tr.Aud.
Jan 14, 2014 9-0 Ginsburg OT 2013
 
Share:

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.

Holding: Daimler cannot be sued in California for injuries allegedly caused by conduct of its Argentinian subsidiary when that conduct took place entirely outside of the United States.

Plain English Summary:

Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on January 14, 2014. Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.   Issue: Whether it violates due process for a court to exercise general personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation based solely on the fact that an indirect corporate subsidiary performs services on behalf of the defendant in the forum state.
Term Snapshot
Awards