Enter your email address to subscribe to updates to this case:
          

Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
15-1439 Cal. Ct. App. TBD TBD TBD TBD OT 2017

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.

Issue: Whether state courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over covered class actions that allege only Securities Act of 1933 claims.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders
May 24 2016Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 27, 2016)
Jun 17 2016Waiver of right of respondents Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, et al. to respond filed.
Jun 27 2016Brief amici curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jun 27 2016Brief amici curiae of Law Professors, Elizabeth Cosenza, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jun 29 2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.
Jul 1 2016Response Requested . (Due August 1, 2016)
Jul 20 2016Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 24, 2016.
Aug 24 2016Brief of respondents Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, et al. in opposition filed.
Sep 7 2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.
Sep 8 2016Reply of petitioners Cyan, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 3 2016The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
May 23 2017Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
Jun 5 2017Supplemental brief of petitioners Cyan, Inc., et al. filed.
Jun 6 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 22, 2017.
Jun 6 2017Supplemental brief of respondents Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jun 26 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 26, 2017.
Jun 27 2017Petition GRANTED.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards