City of Los Angeles v. PatelPending petition
|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the respondent in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether facial challenges to ordinances and statutes are permitted under the Fourth Amendment; and (2) whether a hotel has an expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment in a hotel guest registry where the guest-supplied information is mandated by law and an ordinance authorizes the police to inspect the registry, and if so, whether the ordinance is facially unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment unless it expressly provides for pre-compliance judicial review before the police can inspect the registry.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders|
|Mar 24 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 28, 2014)|
|Apr 25 2014||Waiver of right of respondents Naranjibhai Patel, et al to respond filed.|
|May 6 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 22, 2014.|
|May 19 2014||Response Requested . (Due June 18, 2014)|
|May 28 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 18, 2014.|
|Jul 10 2014||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including August 18, 2014.|
|Aug 12 2014||Brief of respondents Naranjibhai Patel, et al in opposition filed.|
|Aug 25 2014||Reply of petitioner City of Los Angeles, California filed.|
|Aug 27 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.|