Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

We’re hosting a symposium on the Roberts court and the First Amendment’s religion clauses. In a series of six essays, scholars and commentators will analyze major decisions from the 2019-20 term and look to the future of the court’s religion jurisprudence. Click to follow along.

SCOTUSblog on camera: Decision Day (26 June 2014) Kate Starr

Kate Starr, a women’s rights activist and intern in Washington, D.C., reacts to the Supreme Court’s decision in McCullen v. Coakley, striking down a Massachusetts law establishing a thirty-five-foot “buffer zone” around reproductive health centers. (Fabrizio di Piazza)

[Please note:  Ms. Starr is an intern at the National Organization for Women. She was careful to say that the views she expresses here are her own; her views do not represent those of NOW.]

Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards