In Arizona, the deadline to register to vote in the November 2020 election was Oct. 5, 2020. On that day, U.S. District Judge Steven Logan extended the voter-registration deadline by 18 days, ordering state election officials to accept all voter-registration applications that they received by Oct. 23.
Logan’s order came at the request of two non-profit groups that register voters, Mi Familia Vota and the Arizona Coalition for Change, as well as a Mi Familia Vota organizer, Ulises Ventura. They argued that enforcing the Oct. 5 deadline during the COVID-19 pandemic would burden their constitutional rights.
The state countered that the plaintiffs had waited too long to bring their case, and that it has implemented various measures – for example, allowing voters to register online – to make it easier to register to vote. Logan acknowledged “the importance of reducing voter confusion,” but he observed that “31 other states have later voter deadlines than Arizona.” Moreover, Logan added, voters are not likely to be confused if the deadline is extended: “Voters who are already registered will not need to bother with the new deadline, and those voters that were unable to register before” the Oct. 5 deadline “now have extra time.”
The Republican National Committee, which had joined the lawsuit to oppose the plaintiffs’ request for an extension, appealed Logan’s ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.
In an unsigned opinion on Oct. 13, the 9th Circuit put Logan’s order on hold, effective Oct. 15. The 9th Circuit reasoned that although restrictions imposed because of the coronavirus pandemic made it harder for the plaintiffs to register voters, they could still do so online or by mail. By contrast, the 9th Circuit continued, an Oct. 23 deadline would place a “significant” administrative burden on the state. And the plaintiffs’ “extremely late filing relative to the deadline” also weighed in favor of the state, the court of appeals concluded.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders|
|September 30, 2020||Motion for preliminary injunction filed by Mi Familia Vota, et al., in district court|
|October 2, 2020||Response in opposition to preliminary injunction filed by Katie Hobbs, secretary of state of Arizona|
|October 2, 2020||Motion to intervene as defendants filed by Republican National Committee, et al.|
|October 5, 2020||Intervenor's response in opposition to preliminary injunction filed by Republican National Committee, et al.|
|October 5, 2020||District court order extending voter registration deadline to Oct. 23, 2020, by 5 p.m.|
|October 5, 2020||Notice of appeal to 9th Circuit filed by Republican National Committee, at al.|
|October 13, 2020||Prospective stay of deadline extension issued by 9th Circuit, to take effect on Oct. 15|
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
In this morning's orders list, SCOTUS took no action on pending cert petitions involving:
- Mississippi's near-ban on abortions after 15 weeks,
- a Trump rule banning Title X clinics from providing abortion referrals,
- the Trump administration's "public charge" immigration rule.
No real opinions today. The Supreme Court dismissed cert as "improvidently granted" in Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc.—a case about arbitration agreements.
That's all for today, folks.
The Supreme Court does not add any cases to its docket. It sends the Trump emoluments case back to the lower court with instructions to dismiss as moot.
Here is the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012521zor_3f14.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.