U.S. Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida
Linked with:
Disclosure: Goldstein and Russell, P.C. represents AARP as amicus curiae in support of the petitioners in this case.
Holding: The Anti-Injunction Act does not bar a challenge to the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act’s “individual mandate” provision, which requires virtually all Americans to obtain health insurance or pay a penalty, even though the mandate has not yet gone into effect. Although the mandate is not authorized under the Commerce Clause, it is nonetheless a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Taxing Clause. Finally, the Medicaid expansion provision of the ACA violates the Constitution by threatening states with the loss of their existing Medicaid funding if they decline to comply with the expansion.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Academic highlight: Clashing perspectives in the Harvard Law Review's 2011 Supreme Court Issue (Amanda Frost, January 2, 2013)
- A giant hole in the safety net? (Lyle Denniston, June 28, 2012)
- Don't call it a mandate -- it's a tax (UPDATED) (Lyle Denniston, June 28, 2012)
- A reader's guide to health care ruling (Lyle Denniston, June 27, 2012)
- Health care: Time to sum up (Lyle Denniston, June 26, 2012)
- New plea to rule on health mandate (Lyle Denniston, May 4, 2012)
- Today’s argument in Plain English: Will the mandate squeak by? (Amy Howe, March 27, 2012)
- Is Kennedy the only possible fifth vote for the government? (Kevin Russell, March 27, 2012)
- A tale of two great arguments (Tom Goldstein, March 27, 2012)
- Argument recap: Moving on to the mandate (FINAL UPDATE) (Lyle Denniston, March 26, 2012)
- Searching for clues on the Justices’ inclinations about the constitutionality of the individual mandate (Kevin Russell, March 26, 2012)
- Anti-Injunction Act oral argument: In Plain English (Amy Howe, March 26, 2012)
- We listen to the whole AIA argument, so you don't have to (Tom Goldstein, March 26, 2012)
- Update from the oral argument (audio) (Max Mallory, March 26, 2012)
- Academic round-up (Amanda Frost, March 23, 2012)
- Argument preview: Health care, Part III -- Beyond the mandate (Lyle Denniston, March 22, 2012)
- Argument preview: Health care, Part II -- Fate of the mandate (Lyle Denniston, March 21, 2012)
- Argument preview: Health care, Part I -- The power to decide? (Lyle Denniston, March 20, 2012)
- Prompt release of health care audiotapes (Lyle Denniston, March 16, 2012)
- Challengers lose on health arguments (Lyle Denniston, February 21, 2012)
- Health care challengers' view on argument (Lyle Denniston, February 9, 2012)
- Postpone mandate test, Court urged (Lyle Denniston, January 6, 2012)
- Health care debate reopens (Lyle Denniston, January 6, 2012)
- Analysis: Health care's legal, political fate (Lyle Denniston, December 30, 2011)
- Analysis: Health care's Medicaid expansion (Lyle Denniston, December 27, 2011)
- 3 days of argument on health care (Lyle Denniston, December 19, 2011)
- Analysis: Health care's other mandate (Lyle Denniston, December 19, 2011)
- Health care schedule set (Lyle Denniston, December 8, 2011)
- Analysis: Health care's "sleeper issue" (Lyle Denniston, November 22, 2011)
- The health care grants: In Plain English (Amy Howe, November 17, 2011)
- The Court's agenda on health care (Lyle Denniston, November 14, 2011)
- Court sets 5 1/2-hour hearing on health care (FINAL) (Lyle Denniston, November 14, 2011)
- Health care: Now, it's the Court's turn (Lyle Denniston, November 10, 2011)
Briefs and Documents
From Oral Argument
- Anti-Injunction Act argument audio and transcript. SCOTUSblog’s highlights from the audio are here.
- Individual Mandate argument audio and transcript. SCOTUSblog’s highlights from the audio are here.
Merits Briefs for the Department of Health and Human Services Regarding the Minimum Coverage Provision
Amicus Briefs Supporting the Department of Health and Human Services Regarding the Minimum Coverage Provision
Merits Briefs for Florida et al. and the Private Respondents Regarding the Minimum Coverage Provision
Amicus Briefs Supporting Florida et al. and the Private Respondents Regarding the Minimum Coverage Provision
Amicus Briefs Supporting Neither Party
Merits Briefs for Court-Appointed Amicus Regarding the Anti-Injunction Act
Amicus Briefs Supporting the Court- Appointed Amicus Regarding Vacatur
Merits Briefs for the Department of Health and Human Services Regarding the Anti-Injunction Act
Merits Briefs for Florida et al. and the Private Respondents Regarding the Anti-Injunction Act
Amicus Briefs Supporting Florida et al. and the Private Respondents Regarding the Anti-Injunction Act
Other Documents
Certiorari-stage documents