|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-8341||5th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether jurists of reason could debate whether to apply deference under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act to a state court decision arising out of a secret, 13-year-long policy to deny all pro se prisoner writ applications without judicial review.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 18 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 8, 2019)|
|Mar 18 2019||Waiver of right of respondent Darrel Vannoy to respond filed.|
|Mar 25 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Darrel Vannoy.|
|Mar 28 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.|
|Mar 29 2019||Blanket Consent and letter filed by Petitioner, Louie M. Schexnayder|
|Apr 04 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 08 2019||Affidavit of Service filed with respect to the brief of amicus curiae for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.|
|Apr 08 2019||Certificate of Compliance filed with respect to the brief of amicus curiae for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.|
|Apr 09 2019||Response Requested. (Due May 9, 2019)|
|Apr 17 2019||Motion of Darrel Vannoy for an extension of time not accepted for filing. (April 22, 2019 -- Corrected version submitted)|
|Apr 17 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 9, 2019 to June 10, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 22 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 10, 2019.|
|May 01 2019||Letter and Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or neither party received from petitioner.|
|Jun 10 2019||Brief of respondent Darrel Vannoy in opposition filed.|
|Jun 26 2019||Reply of petitioner Louie M. Schexnayder filed.|
|Jun 27 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Sep 24 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.|
|Oct 10 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 15 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.|
|Oct 16 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 28 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.|
|Oct 28 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 04 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.|
|Nov 06 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 12 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.|
|Nov 18 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.|
|Dec 02 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.|
|Dec 09 2019||Petition DENIED. Statement of Justice Sotomayor respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...
Two days from now, SCOTUS will hear the biggest abortion case in a generation. In a battle over a Mississippi law, abortion opponents are asking the court to end the constitutional right to abortion. Here's our preview of the case, via @AHoweBlogger.
Roe v. Wade hangs in balance as reshaped court prepares to hear biggest abortion case in decades - SCOTUSblog
When he ran for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would...
JUST IN: One new cert grant this morning: Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP. More on the case here: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/berger-v-north-carolina-state-conference-of-the-naacp/
#SCOTUS adds one new case to its merits docket this morning: Berger v. NC Conference of NAACP, in which the justices will weigh in on an effort by Republican legislators in the state to intervene to defend the state’s voter-ID law. Here's the order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112421zr_7li8.pdf
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
JUST IN: The court issues its only opinion of the day... and it's in Mississippi v. Tennessee, a dispute over interstate groundwater. No ruling on the Texas abortion law today.
Here's the unanimous opinion in Mississippi v. Tennessee: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/143orig_1qm1.pdf
A quiet Monday morning order list: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112221zor_kifl.pdf. The court adds no new cases to its docket.
Now counting down until opinions at 10 a.m. EST...