WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Monday, Jan. 23
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55e/4c55eb93b517b45f4fd3c3f2a1e84cff9c1fb08f" alt=""
on Jan 23, 2023 at 8:28 am
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15570/1557003cb65f96707c9d9e2be17c72e5fc3727b2" alt=""
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.
Here’s the Monday morning read:
- Inside the Supreme Court Inquiry: Seized Phones, Affidavits and Distrust (Jodi Kantor, The New York Times)
- Protesting against Congress may get you a $50 fine. Disrupting the Supreme Court is a different story. (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News)
- Takeaways from Sundance’s secret Brett Kavanaugh documentary (Jada Yuan, The Washington Post)
- Leak probe highlights U.S. Supreme Court’s problems protecting information (Nate Raymond & John Kruzel, Reuters)
- The Leak Investigation and the Separation of Powers (Steve Vladeck, One First)