Monday round-up

The Supreme Court’s 2020-21 docket continues to slowly fill up. The justices announced late Friday that they will hear oral argument on Nov. 30 in Trump v. New York, a high-profile dispute over the Trump administration’s plan to exclude people who are living in the country illegally from the census-based population counts that are used to reapportion seats in the House of Representatives. And the justices may decide to add one or more cases on Monday morning, when they are expected to release orders from private conference last Friday.

Other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web:

• The Supreme Court We Need (Linda Greenhouse, The New York Review of Books)
• The Dishonesty of Amy Coney Barrett’s “Textualist” Pose (Simon Lazarus, The New Republic)
• The Most Useless Job Interview Ever (David Cohen, Rolling Stone)
• Barrett Won’t Pull Away From Trump’s Coattails (Kenneth Jost, Jost on Justice)
• Week Two of the 2020 Supreme Court Term: Oral Argument Analysis (Tonja Jacobi & Matthew Sag, SCOTUS OA)
• Supreme Court to Consider Trump Effort to Exclude Some From Key Census Figure (Mark Walsh, Education Week)
• Barrett hearings are done. Here are 5 things to know (Pamela King, E&E News)
• Packing the Court — Revisited (Marty London, Marty’s Blog)

We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, podcast or op-ed relating to the Supreme Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion, please send it to roundup@scotusblog.com. Thank you!