Breaking News

Afternoon round-up: Today’s “one person, one vote” oral arguments

This morning the Court heard oral arguments in two cases involving the principle of “one person, one vote.”  Amy Howe covered the oral argument in Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission for this blog, while Lyle Denniston covered the second argument, in Evenwel v. Abbott.

Other early coverage of today’s arguments comes from Howard Fischer at Arizona Capitol Times, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Selena Hill at Latin Post, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, David Savage of Los Angeles Times, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Mark Walsh at Education Week, Nina Totenberg for NPR, and Sam Hananel for the Associated Press.

Early commentary comes from Derek Muller for Excess of Democracy, Ian Millhiser at Think Progress, Janaye Ingram for New Pittsburgh Courier, Andrew Grossman at The Federalist Society, Stacie Burgess at Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and Michael Lindenberger for The Dallas Morning News Trail Blazers Blog.

Recommended Citation: Andrew Hamm, Afternoon round-up: Today’s “one person, one vote” oral arguments, SCOTUSblog (Dec. 8, 2015, 7:17 PM),