Lambert v. Brown

Petition for certiorari denied on February 24, 2020

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
19-541	9th Cir.	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	OT 2019

Issue: (1) Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred by failing to address whether a reasonable officer in Detective Michael Lambert"s position would have objectively believed his conduct, in deciding what information to include or not to include in the affidavit, was lawful in light of clearly established law; and (2) whether the 9th Circuit erred by failing to address whether the plaintiffs made a substantial showing of deliberate falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth by Lambert.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Petitions of the week (Andrew Hamm, January 31, 2020)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
10/21/2019	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 25, 2019)
10/25/2019	Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 25, 2019 to December 26, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
10/29/2019	Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 26, 2019.
12/26/2019	Brief of respondents Estate of Kevin Brown, et al. in opposition filed.
01/09/2020	Reply of petitioner Michael Lambert filed.
01/15/2020	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
02/24/2020	Petition DENIED.