Hooks v. Langford
Petition for certiorari denied on May 30, 2017
Issue: (1) Whether a state court unreasonably applied this court's cases under Section 2254(d)(1) when it held that a misplaced adverb in one jury instruction on state law did not violate federal due process; and (2) whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit properly held that the alleged instructional error was harmful and that Davis v. Ayala was irrelevant to the harmless-error inquiry.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
01/11/2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 13, 2017) |
01/11/2017 | Appendix of Mark Hooks, Warden filed. |
01/31/2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 15, 2017. |
03/14/2017 | Brief of respondent Mark Langford in opposition filed. |
03/27/2017 | Reply of petitioner Mark Hooks, Warden filed. (Distributed) |
03/28/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 13, 2017. |
04/12/2017 | Rescheduled. |
04/17/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 21, 2017. |
04/19/2017 | Record Requested . |
04/24/2017 | Record received from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit. The record is electronic and available on PACER. |
04/24/2017 | Record received from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of Ohio. The record is electronic and available on PACER. |
05/02/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 18, 2017. |
05/22/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 25, 2017. |
05/23/2017 | Application (16A1153) to recall and stay mandate pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
05/30/2017 | Petition DENIED. |
05/30/2017 | Application (16A1153) denied by Justice Kagan. |