Skip to content

Corliss v. Crossroads Financing, LLC

Petition for certiorari denied on June 13, 2022

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
21-1359 Cal. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2021

Issue: Whether "prejudice" to the party opposing arbitration is even a factor, let alone the determinative factor, a California state court or any state or federal court must consider in deciding whether the party moving to compel arbitration has waived its right to compel arbitration; and (2) whether this petition for writ of certiorari is related to and should be consolidated with the case of Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
04/05/2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 19, 2022)
05/17/2022Waiver of right of respondent Crossroads Financing, LLC to respond filed.
05/24/2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.
05/27/2022Supplemental Brief of Robert Corliss not accepted for filing. (June 06, 2022) (Duplicate efiling)
06/01/2022Supplemental brief of petitioner Robert Corliss filed. (Distributed)
06/13/2022Petition DENIED.