Corliss v. Crossroads Financing, LLC
Petition for certiorari denied on June 13, 2022
Issue: Whether "prejudice" to the party opposing arbitration is even a factor, let alone the determinative factor, a California state court or any state or federal court must consider in deciding whether the party moving to compel arbitration has waived its right to compel arbitration; and (2) whether this petition for writ of certiorari is related to and should be consolidated with the case of Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
04/05/2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 19, 2022) |
05/17/2022 | Waiver of right of respondent Crossroads Financing, LLC to respond filed. |
05/24/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022. |
05/27/2022 | Supplemental Brief of Robert Corliss not accepted for filing. (June 06, 2022) (Duplicate efiling) |
06/01/2022 | Supplemental brief of petitioner Robert Corliss filed. (Distributed) |
06/13/2022 | Petition DENIED. |