Citizens Against Reservation Shopping v. Haugrud
Petition for certiorari denied on April 3, 2017
Issue: (1) Whether, under the Indian Reorganization Act, to have been a "recognized Indian tribe now under Federal jurisdiction" in 1934, a tribe must have been "recognized" at that time; and (2) whether, to have been "under Federal jurisdiction" in 1934, a tribe must have been located in Indian country"that is, on land over which the United States exercised jurisdiction to the exclusion of state jurisdiction.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Kate Howard, December 29, 2016)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 10/27/2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 28, 2016) |
| 11/23/2016 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 28, 2016, for all respondents. |
| 11/23/2016 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by California State Association of Counties, et al. |
| 11/28/2016 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon. |
| 11/28/2016 | Brief amici curiae of California Tribal Business Alliance, et al. filed. |
| 12/20/2016 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 27, 2017. |
| 01/18/2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including February 17, 2017. |
| 02/17/2017 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 1, 2017. |
| 03/01/2017 | Brief of Federal respondents in opposition filed. |
| 03/01/2017 | Brief of respondent The Cowlitz Indian Tribe in opposition filed. |
| 03/15/2017 | Reply of petitioners Citizens Against Reservation Shopping, et al. filed. |
| 03/15/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 31, 2017. |
| 04/03/2017 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by California State Association of Counties, et al. GRANTED. |
| 04/03/2017 | Petition DENIED. |