Chung v. Silva
Petition for certiorari denied on February 19, 2019
Issue: (1) Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred in denying the officers qualified immunity by defining clearly established law at too high a level of generality rather than considering the particular facts and circumstances of this case; and (2) whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, having found that the officers were exercising a community caretaking function, erred by only considering the reasonableness of their caretaking while disregarding the requirement of clearly established law.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
11/19/2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 27, 2018) |
12/13/2018 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Christopher Chung, et al. |
12/27/2018 | Brief amici curiae of National Association of Police Organizations, et al. filed. |
12/27/2018 | Brief of respondents Gulstan E. Silva, Jr., et al. in opposition filed. |
01/15/2019 | Reply of petitioners Christopher Chung, et al. filed. |
01/16/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019. |
02/19/2019 | Petition DENIED. |