Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. v. Arctic Cat Inc.

Petition for certiorari denied on October 1, 2018

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
17-1645	Fed. Cir.	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	OT 2018

Issue: Whether a finding of willful infringement based on In re Seagate"s "should have been known" negligence standard violates the requirement that subjective willfulness must be "intentional or knowing," as set forth by the Supreme Court in Halo Electronics Inc. v. Pulse Electronics Inc..

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes, June 23, 2018)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
06/06/2018	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 9, 2018)
06/08/2018	Amended Proof of Service filed.
06/29/2018	Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 8, 2018.
06/29/2018	Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 9, 2018 to August 8, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
07/09/2018	Brief amicus curiae of Intel Corporation filed.
07/09/2018	Brief amicus curiae of High Tech Investors Alliance filed.
08/08/2018	Brief of respondent Arctic Cat Inc. in opposition filed.
08/21/2018	Reply of petitioners Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., et al. filed.
08/22/2018	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
10/01/2018	Petition DENIED.