Abdur’Rahman v. Westbrooks
Petition for certiorari denied on February 27, 0017
Issue: (1) Whether a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) motion premised on Martinez v. Ryan and Trevino v. Thaler is categorically ineligible for relief; and (2) whether Martinez and Trevino apply to claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel which"like the claims in Martinez and Trevino"could not be brought before state post-conviction review.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
05/18/2016 | Application (15A1190) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 31, 2016 to July 29, 2016, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
05/20/2016 | Application (15A1190) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 29, 2016. |
07/29/2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 31, 2016) |
08/31/2016 | Brief of respondent Bruce Westbrooks, Warden in opposition filed. |
09/13/2016 | Reply of petitioner Abu-Ali Abdur'Rahman filed. |
09/14/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 7, 2016. |
02/22/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 24, 2017. |
02/23/2017 | Letter of February 22, 2017 from counsel for petitioner received. |
02/27/2017 | Petition DENIED. |