|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-628||D.C. Cir.||Nov 3, 2014||Jun 8, 2015||6-3||Kennedy||OT 2014|
Holding: Because the power to recognize foreign states resides in the president alone, Section 214(d) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 2003 – which directs the Secretary of State, upon request, to designate “Israel” as the place of birth on the passport of a U.S. citizen who is born in Jerusalem – infringes on the executive’s consistent decision to withhold recognition with respect to Jerusalem.
Judgment: Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy on June 8, 2015. Justice Breyer filed a concurring opinion. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgement in part and dissenting in part. Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Alito joined. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts, and Justice Alito joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 8 2013||Application (13A354) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 21, 2013 to November 20, 2013, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Oct 8 2013||Application (13A354) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 20, 2013.|
|Nov 20 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2013)|
|Dec 18 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 22, 2014.|
|Dec 23 2013||Brief amici curiae of Members of the United States Senate, and United States House of Representatives filed.|
|Jan 14 2014||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including February 21, 2014.|
|Feb 21 2014||Brief of respondent John Kerry, Secretary of State in opposition filed.|
|Mar 3 2014||Reply of petitioner Menachem Binyamin Zivotofsky, By His Parents and Guardians, Ari Z. and Naomi Siegman Zivotofsky filed.|
|Mar 12 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 28, 2014.|
|Mar 31 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 4, 2014.|
|Apr 7 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 18, 2014.|
|Apr 21 2014||Petition GRANTED.|
|May 8 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 15, 2014.|
|May 8 2014||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 22, 2014.|
|Jul 15 2014||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Jul 15 2014||Brief of petitioner Menachem Binyamin Zivotofsky, By His Parents and Guardians, Ari Z. and Naomi Siegman Zivotofsky filed.|
|Jul 17 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Louis Fisher filed.|
|Jul 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of American Jewish Committee filed.|
|Jul 22 2014||Brief amici curiae of Anti-Defamation League, et al. filed.|
|Jul 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Endowment for Middle East Truth (EMET) filed.|
|Jul 22 2014||Brief amici curiae of Members of the United States House of Representatives filed.|
|Jul 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Texas filed.|
|Jul 22 2014||Brief amici curiae of Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, et al. filed.|
|Jul 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Zionist Organization of America filed.|
|Jul 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen, Inc. filed.|
|Jul 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists (R.A.) filed.|
|Jul 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of The United States Senate filed.|
|Sep 4 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 3, 2014.|
|Sep 8 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. for the District of Columbia Circuit.|
|Sep 9 2014||Record received from U.S.D.C. of District of Columbia is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Sep 16 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A District of Columbia Circuit is located on PACER. Also record received from U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit. 1-Box|
|Sep 19 2014||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief of respondent John Kerry, Secretary of State filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 29 2014||Brief amicus curiae of The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 29 2014||Brief amicus curiae of True Torah Jews, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 29 2014||Brief amicus curiae of David Boyle filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 22 2014||Reply of petitioner Menachem Binyamin Zivotofsky, By His Parents and Guardians, Ari Z. and Naomi Siegman Zivotofsky filed.|
|Nov 3 2014||Argued. For petitioner: Alyza D. Lewin, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 8 2015||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a concurring opinion. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. Roberts, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Alito, J., joined. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Alito, J., joined.|
|Jul 10 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Jul 15 2015||Record from U.S.C.A. DC Circuit has been returned.|
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
I really enjoyed getting to chat with the incomparable @AHoweBlogger about (1) why #SCOTUS's "shadow docket" *is* a big deal; (2) why it's so hard to figure out how to include it in broader assessments of the Justices' work; and (3) some possible ways to include it going forward. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1417545384314949635
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.