|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-272||9th Cir.||Not Argued||Feb 25, 2019||n/a||Per Curiam||OT 2018|
Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred when it counted as a member of the majority a judge who died before the court’s opinion in this case was filed.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on February 25, 2019.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 22 2018||Application (17A1404) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 8, 2018 to August 23, 2018, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Jun 26 2018||Application (17A1404) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until August 23, 2018.|
|Aug 13 2018||Application (17A1404) to extend further the time from August 23, 2018 to September 4, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Aug 15 2018||Application (17A1404) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 4, 2018.|
|Aug 30 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 4, 2018)|
|Sep 17 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 4, 2018 to November 5, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 21 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 5, 2018.|
|Oct 04 2018||Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Oct 04 2018||Brief amici curiae of Center for Workplace Compliance, et al. filed.|
|Nov 05 2018||Brief of respondent Aileen Rizo in opposition filed.|
|Nov 19 2018||Reply of petitioner Fresno County Superintendent of Schools filed.|
|Nov 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.|
|Dec 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.|
|Jan 14 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.|
|Feb 04 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.|
|Feb 19 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.|
|Feb 25 2019||Petition GRANTED. The judgment is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion). Justice Sotomayor concurs in the judgment.|
|Mar 29 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. He’s flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.