|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-272||9th Cir.||Not Argued||Feb 25, 2019||n/a||Per Curiam||OT 2018|
Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred when it counted as a member of the majority a judge who died before the court’s opinion in this case was filed.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on February 25, 2019.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 22 2018||Application (17A1404) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 8, 2018 to August 23, 2018, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Jun 26 2018||Application (17A1404) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until August 23, 2018.|
|Aug 13 2018||Application (17A1404) to extend further the time from August 23, 2018 to September 4, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Aug 15 2018||Application (17A1404) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 4, 2018.|
|Aug 30 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 4, 2018)|
|Sep 17 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 4, 2018 to November 5, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 21 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 5, 2018.|
|Oct 04 2018||Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Oct 04 2018||Brief amici curiae of Center for Workplace Compliance, et al. filed.|
|Nov 05 2018||Brief of respondent Aileen Rizo in opposition filed.|
|Nov 19 2018||Reply of petitioner Fresno County Superintendent of Schools filed.|
|Nov 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.|
|Dec 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.|
|Jan 14 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.|
|Feb 04 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.|
|Feb 19 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.|
|Feb 25 2019||Petition GRANTED. The judgment is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion). Justice Sotomayor concurs in the judgment.|
|Mar 29 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
I really enjoyed getting to chat with the incomparable @AHoweBlogger about (1) why #SCOTUS's "shadow docket" *is* a big deal; (2) why it's so hard to figure out how to include it in broader assessments of the Justices' work; and (3) some possible ways to include it going forward. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1417545384314949635
How do you solve a problem like the shadow docket? @steve_vladeck has some thoughts and shared them with @AHoweBlogger in the latest SCOTUStalk.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.