Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19-1176 | 9th Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2019 |
Issue: Whether prior salary is “[an]other factor other than sex” under the Equal Pay Act, which permits employers to pay men and women different wages for the same work “where such payment is made pursuant to (i) a seniority system; (ii) a merit system; (iii) a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; or (iv) a differential based on any other factor other than sex.”
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Mar 24 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 27, 2020) |
Apr 13 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 27, 2020 to June 26, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
Apr 16 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part; the time is extended to and including May 27, 2020. |
Apr 22 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Society for Human Resource Management filed. |
Apr 27 2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Center for Workplace Compliance filed. |
Apr 27 2020 | Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. |
May 27 2020 | Brief of Aileen Rizo in opposition not accepted for filing. (May 29, 2020) (Corrected verison submitted). |
May 27 2020 | Brief of respondent Aileen Rizo in opposition filed. |
Jun 01 2020 | Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed. |
Jun 01 2020 | Reply of Fresno County Superintendent of Schools not accepted for filing. (June 02, 2020 - Corrected brief to be submitted) |
Jun 01 2020 | Reply of petitioner Fresno County Superintendent of Schools filed. (Distributed)(6/3/2020) |
Jun 02 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020. |
Jun 16 2020 | Rescheduled. |
Jun 22 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020. |
Jun 23 2020 | Rescheduled. |
Jun 29 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2020. |
Jul 02 2020 | Petition DENIED. |
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.
NEW: Next Monday will be a Supreme Court opinion day. Starting at 10 a.m. EDT, the court expects to issue one or more decisions in argued cases from the current term.
Just in: The Supreme Court denies a request to block the execution of Clarence Dixon, an Arizona man who is scheduled to be put to death today. Dixon's attorneys argued that, because of a mental illness, Dixon is not mentally fit to be executed under the Eighth Amendment.
On this date in “How Appealing” history: At this very moment twenty years ago, this blog came into existence, boosting your humble author from nearly total obscurity to perhaps a modicum less than nearly total obscurity.
On this happy occasion, I once https://howappealing.abovethelaw.com/2022/05/06/#179553
How the unprecedented Supreme Court leak may have been a response to an earlier disclosure about the justices' private deliberations. @TomGoldsteinSB on what it all means for the court and its secrets.
How the leak might have happened - SCOTUSblog
Among the debates generated by the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in Dobbs is whether the leaker was...
www.scotusblog.com
JUST IN: The Supreme Court confirms the authenticity of the draft opinion revealed last night by Politico. The chief justice has ordered an investigation into the leak.