|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1241||La. Ct. App.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2017|
Issues: (1) Whether exculpatory evidence that is inadmissible can be material under Brady v. Maryland; and (2) whether a court evaluating the materiality of suppressed evidence under Brady against a confession should take into account a post-trial judicial finding that the defendant was an intellectually disabled child.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 08 2018||Application (17A725) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 25, 2018 to March 12, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Jan 09 2018||Application (17A725) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 23, 2018.|
|Feb 12 2018||Application (17A725) to extend further the time from February 23, 2018 to March 25, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Feb 12 2018||Application (17A725) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until March 26, 2018.|
|Mar 02 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 5, 2018)|
|Apr 04 2018||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Innocence Project New Orleans.|
|Apr 05 2018||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by The Fair Punishment Project, et al.|
|Apr 05 2018||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Former Prosecutors and Department of Justice Officials.|
|Apr 05 2018||Waiver of right of respondent State of Louisiana to respond filed.|
|Apr 11 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018.|
|Apr 16 2018||Response Requested. (Due May 16, 2018)|
|Apr 20 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 16, 2018 to June 15, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 23 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 15, 2018.|
|May 31 2018||Stipulation to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46.1 filed.|
|Jun 01 2018||Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.|
NEW: The Supreme Court will review the legality of Biden's student-debt relief plan. The justices will hear oral argument in February. In the meantime, the plan remains blocked as a result of lower-court rulings.
Today at SCOTUS: One oral argument on the statute of limitations in the Quiet Title Act. Is it "jurisdictional"? Or just a "claim-processing rule"? That might sound arcane, but cases like these affect the ability of citizens to sue the federal government.
A squabble over a forest road may pave the way for further narrowing of “jurisdictional” timing rules - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Wilkins v. United States is next in a protracted line of cases in which the court ...
Bribery or lobbying?
Percoco v. United States in a TikTok minute.
JUST IN: For the second time in the past week, SCOTUS denies an emergency request to block the execution of Kevin Johnson. The execution is scheduled for tonight in Missouri. Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissent from the brief order allowing the execution to proceed.
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas:
In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to...
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.