|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1241||La. Ct. App.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2017|
Issues: (1) Whether exculpatory evidence that is inadmissible can be material under Brady v. Maryland; and (2) whether a court evaluating the materiality of suppressed evidence under Brady against a confession should take into account a post-trial judicial finding that the defendant was an intellectually disabled child.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 08 2018||Application (17A725) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 25, 2018 to March 12, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Jan 09 2018||Application (17A725) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 23, 2018.|
|Feb 12 2018||Application (17A725) to extend further the time from February 23, 2018 to March 25, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Feb 12 2018||Application (17A725) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until March 26, 2018.|
|Mar 02 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 5, 2018)|
|Apr 04 2018||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Innocence Project New Orleans.|
|Apr 05 2018||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by The Fair Punishment Project, et al.|
|Apr 05 2018||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Former Prosecutors and Department of Justice Officials.|
|Apr 05 2018||Waiver of right of respondent State of Louisiana to respond filed.|
|Apr 11 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018.|
|Apr 16 2018||Response Requested. (Due May 16, 2018)|
|Apr 20 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 16, 2018 to June 15, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 23 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 15, 2018.|
|May 31 2018||Stipulation to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46.1 filed.|
|Jun 01 2018||Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.|
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. He’s flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.