Whitfield v. United States

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
13-9026	4th Cir.	Dec 2, 2014 Tr.Aud.	Jan 13, 2015	9-0	Scalia	OT 2014

Holding: A bank robber “forces [a] person to accompany him,” for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(e), when he forces that person to go somewhere with him, even if the movement occurs entirely within a single building or over a short distance.

Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on January 13, 2015.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Opinion analysis: Bank robbery statute perhaps not so very bad after all (Amy Howe)
View from the courtroom: Justice Scalia, a bit late to the stage (Mark Walsh)
Argument analysis: Court takes on “very peculiar” bank robbery statute (Amy Howe)
Argument preview: Parsing “accompany” in the federal bank robbery statute (Amy Howe)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Mar 7 2014	Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 7, 2014)
Mar 31 2014	Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 7, 2014.
May 7 2014	Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
May 21 2014	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 5, 2014.
Jun 9 2014	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 12, 2014.
Jun 16 2014	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 19, 2014.
Jun 23 2014	Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.
Jul 22 2014	The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 22, 2014.
Jul 22 2014	The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 7, 2014.
Aug 22 2014	Joint appendix filed.
Aug 22 2014	Brief of petitioner Larry Whitfield filed.
Aug 29 2014	Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
Aug 29 2014	Brief amicus curiae of The Center on the Administration of Criminal Law filed.
Sep 4 2014	SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, December 2, 2014.
Sep 22 2014	Record requested from U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit.
Sep 23 2014	Record received from U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER, part of the record is SEALED.
Oct 7 2014	Brief of respondent the United States filed.
Oct 27 2014	CIRCULATED.
Nov 6 2014	Reply of petitioner Larry Whitfield filed. (Distributed)
Dec 2 2014	Argued. For petitioner: Joshua B. Carpenter, Asheville, N. C. For respondent: Brian H. Fletcher, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
Jan 13 2015	Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Feb 18 2015	JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Featured Posts

Remembering Justice Stevens: A lost link to our past – Gregory Garre

Challengers respond in dispute over funding for border wall – Amy Howe

Justice Stevens at oral argument: Often fatal; always kind – Paul Clement
Sponsored by Casetext
SCOTUStalk see all
Email Digest Sign-Up
Receive a daily email digest from Feedburner by entering your email.
Merits Case Pages and Archives

Archives

or

This Week at the Court
The justices are on their summer recess.
Major Cases
- Department of Commerce v. New York
  The secretary of the Department of Commerce did not violate the enumeration clause or the Census Act in deciding to reinstate a citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire, but the district court was warranted in remanding the case back to the agency where the evidence tells a story that does not match the secretary’s explanation for his decision.
- Kisor v. Wilkie
  Auer v. Robbins and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co – under which deference is given to an agency’s reasonable reading of its own genuinely ambiguous regulations – are not overruled.
- Rucho v. Common Cause
  Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.
- The American Legion v. American Humanist Association
  The Bladensburg Cross does not violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment.
- Gamble v. United States
  The dual-sovereignty doctrine – under which two offenses are not the “same offence” for double jeopardy purposes if prosecuted by separate sovereigns – is upheld.
see all this term’s cases »
Recent Decisions
- Lamone v. Benisek Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.
- Department of Commerce v. New York The secretary of the Department of Commerce did not violate the enumeration clause or the Census Act in deciding to reinstate a citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire, but the district court was warranted in remanding the case back to the agency where the evidence tells a story that does not match the secretary’s explanation for his decision.
- Mitchell v. Wisconsin The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s judgment – affirming the drunk-driving convictions of Gerald Mitchell, who was administered a warrantless blood test while he was unconscious – is vacated, and the case is remanded.
- Rucho v. Common Cause Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.
- Kisor v. Wilkie Auer v. Robbins and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co – under which deference is given to an agency’s reasonable reading of its own genuinely ambiguous regulations – are not overruled.
- Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas Tennessee’s 2-year durational-residency requirement applicable to retail liquor store license applicants violates the commerce clause and is not saved by the 21st Amendment.
- United States v. Haymond The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit’s judgment – that 18 U. S. C. §3583(k)’s last two sentences are unconstitutional and unenforceable – is vacated, and the case is remanded.
- Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media Where commercial or financial information is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner and provided to the government under an assurance of privacy, the information is “confidential” within the meaning of 5 U. S. C. §552(b)(4), the Freedom of Information Act’s Exemption 4.
- Iancu v. Brunetti The Lanham Act prohibition on the registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks infringes the First Amendment.
- The Dutra Group v. Batterton A plaintiff may not recover punitive damages on a maritime claim of unseaworthiness.
- United States v. Davis Title 18 U. S. C. §924(c)(3)(B), which provides enhanced penalties for using a firearm during a “crime of violence,” is unconstitutionally vague.
see all this term’s cases »
Current Relists
Recent Special Features
Statistical Snapshot

Cases argued 70

Cases decided 67

Summary reversals 5

Merits cases granted to date 74

see all »
Live Blog Archives
See all
Twitter Feed

Tweets by @SCOTUSblog

Majority Opinions by Author
Voting Breakdown Argued Cases

Calendar: July 2019
Full Calendar Submit Event

July 2019

Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa

1

2

3

4
Holiday

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31
- Orders/Opinions
- Arguments
- Conferences
- Events
- Holidays
- Multiple

Su	Mo	Tu	We	Th	Fr	Sa
	1	2	3	4 Holiday	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30	31

Download our App in the Apple Store
Videos see all

Justice Thomas at the Supreme Court Historical Society

On June 3, Justice Clarence Thomas spoke with David Rubenstein for the Supreme Court Historical Society’s annual lecture at the Supreme Court.

Peabody Award
Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.
Sigma Delta Chi
Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
National Press Club Award
Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
Silver Gavel Award
Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.
American Gavel Award
Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system.
Webby Award
Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet.

Cases argued	70
Cases decided	67
Summary reversals	5
Merits cases granted to date	74

Editor's Note :

Whitfield v. United States

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Featured Posts

Remembering Justice Stevens: A lost link to our past – Gregory Garre

Challengers respond in dispute over funding for border wall – Amy Howe

Justice Stevens at oral argument: Often fatal; always kind – Paul Clement

Sponsored by Casetext

SCOTUStalk see all

Email Digest Sign-Up

Merits Case Pages and Archives

This Week at the Court

Major Cases

Recent Decisions

Current Relists

Recent Special Features

Statistical Snapshot

Live Blog Archives

Twitter Feed

Majority Opinions by Author

Voting Breakdown Argued Cases

Calendar: July 2019

July 2019

Holiday

Download our App in the Apple Store

Videos see all

Peabody Award

Sigma Delta Chi

National Press Club Award

Silver Gavel Award

American Gavel Award

Webby Award