|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-794||6th Cir.||Dec 11, 2013||Apr 23, 2014||6-3||Scalia||OT 2013|
Holding: Because the Kentucky Supreme Court’s rejection of respondent’s Fifth Amendment claim was not objectively unreasonable, the Sixth Circuit erred in granting the writ of habeas.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on April 23, 2014. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg and Justice Sotomayor joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 26 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 4, 2013)|
|Dec 26 2012||Appendix of Randy White, Warden filed.|
|Jan 25 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 6, 2013.|
|Mar 6 2013||Brief of respondent Robert Keith Woodall in opposition filed.|
|Mar 6 2013||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Robert Keith Woodall.|
|Mar 20 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 12, 2013.|
|Mar 25 2013||Reply of petitioner Randy White, Warden filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 9 2013||Record Requested .|
|Apr 10 2013||Record received for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucy are electronically filed (Not on PACER)|
|Apr 16 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 9, 2013.|
|Apr 26 2013||Record received from U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky at Paducah (2 Boxes).|
|Apr 30 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 16, 2013.|
|May 20 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 23, 2013.|
|May 28 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 30, 2013.|
|Jun 3 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 6, 2013.|
|Jun 10 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 13, 2013.|
|Jun 17 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 20, 2013.|
|Jun 25 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 26, 2013.|
|Jun 27 2013||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Jun 27 2013||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 12 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 11, 2013.|
|Jul 18 2013||Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent Robert Keith Woodall.|
|Jul 24 2013||Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.|
|Sep 11 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the respondent.|
|Sep 11 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Sep 11 2013||Brief of petitioner Randy White, Warden filed.|
|Sep 17 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday December 11, 2013.|
|Sep 17 2013||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 17 2013||Brief amici curiae of Arizona and Thirteen Other States filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 18 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Texas filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 18 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 1 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including November 12, 2013.|
|Oct 7 2013||Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED. Laurence E. Komp, Esquire, of Manchester, Missouri, is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in this case.|
|Nov 12 2013||Brief of respondent Robert Keith Woodall filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 19 2013||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 19 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Los Angeles County Public Defender's Office filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 3 2013||Reply of petitioner Randy White, Warden filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 11 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Susan R. Lenz, Assistant Attorney General, Frankfort, Ky. For respondent: Laurence E. Komp, Manchester, Mo. (Appointed by this Court.)|
|Apr 23 2014||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg and Sotomayor, JJ., joined.|
|May 19 2014||Petition for Rehearing filed.|
|May 27 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 12, 2014.|
|Jun 16 2014||Rehearing DENIED.|
|Jun 16 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Jun 17 2014||Record returned for U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.|
Released today: annual financial disclosures for eight of the nine justices. Key takeaways: substantial book-royalty income for Sotomayor and Gorsuch; reduced travel reimbursements across the board during the pandemic.
Full story from @AHoweBlogger:
Less travel, plenty of royalties for justices in 2020 - SCOTUSblog
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic were reflected in an unusual source: the justices’ 2020 financial disclosur...
Opinions next week — Monday and Thursday at 10:00 a.m. ET.
With 21 opinions to go, #SCOTUS enters the home stretch: Opinions expected on Monday and Thursday again next week, at 10 am Eastern both days. Court will also issue orders from today's conference at 9:30 am on Monday, June 14.
NEW: SCOTUS rules against federal government's interpretation of the Armed Career Criminal Act. Court says a felony involving recklessness does not satisfy the law's "use of physical force" element and thus does not trigger the law's "violent felony" mandatory minimum sentence.
It's a @SCOTUSblog kind of morning
R.I.P. Judge Robert Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit. His influence on SCOTUS and American law was enormous.
The Supreme Court will release opinion(s?) at 10:00 a.m. ET. We’ll fire up the live blog at 9:45.
There are 22 outstanding opinions in argued cases including the Affordable Care Act, LGBTQ+ / religious liberty, voting rights, and student speech. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-june-10/
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.