|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-899||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether an officer who has consent to “get inside” a house but instead destroys it from the outside is entitled to qualified immunity in the absence of precisely factually on-point case law.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 14 2019||Application (19A565) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 3, 2019 to February 1, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Nov 19 2019||Application (19A565) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 1, 2020.|
|Jan 16 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 20, 2020)|
|Feb 05 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 20, 2020 to March 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 07 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 23, 2020.|
|Feb 20 2020||Brief amici curiae of DKT Liberty Project, et al. filed.|
|Feb 20 2020||Brief amici curiae of Legal Scholars filed.|
|Feb 20 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.|
|Mar 20 2020||Brief of Doug Winfield, et al. in opposition not accepted for filing. (March 23, 2020)|
|Mar 20 2020||Brief of respondents Doug Winfield, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 31 2020||Reply of petitioner Shaniz West filed.|
|Apr 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.|
|Apr 20 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 28 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 13 2020||Rescheduled.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED.|
Just in: The next Supreme Court opinion day will be next Monday. The court expects to release one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term.
End of an era: Here is NBC News prez Noah Oppenheim's memo about Pete Williams' plan to retire this summer
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/