|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-636||Tex. App.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2016|
Issues: (1) Whether, as Justices Ginsburg and Thomas suggested last term, this court should conduct a “fresh examination” of the “separate sovereigns” exception to the double jeopardy clause, Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle (Ginsburg, J., concurring); and (2) whether, as this court has previously suggested, the “separate sovereigns” exception at least should be inapplicable when state and federal prosecutors have worked so closely together that they are “in essential fact” one entity, Bartkus v. Illinois.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 17 2016||Application (16A189) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 13, 2016 to November 12, 2016, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Aug 29 2016||Application (16A189) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until November 12, 2016.|
|Nov 10 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 12, 2016)|
|Nov 23 2016||Waiver of right of respondent Texas to respond filed.|
|Nov 26 2016||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioner.|
|Dec 12 2016||Brief amici curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center, et al. filed.|
|Dec 12 2016||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed.|
|Dec 12 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Stuart Banner filed.|
|Dec 12 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Center on the Administration of Criminal Law filed.|
|Dec 21 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 6, 2017.|
|Dec 27 2016||Response Requested . (Due January 26, 2017)|
|Jan 24 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 3, 2017.|
|Mar 2 2017||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 17, 2017.|
|Mar 17 2017||Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed.|
|Apr 4 2017||Reply of petitioner Calvin Gary Walker filed.|
|Apr 5 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 21, 2017.|
|Apr 24 2017||Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.|
🚨 LIVE NOW 🚨 5PM on IGTV #SimplePolitics join me & @AHoweBlogger editor / reporter for the @SCOTUSblog for a great conversation on the recent decisions by the Supreme Court. There is so much to talk about.
SimplePolitics with Kim Wehle - Special Guest Bill Kristol, Editor-At-Large, The Bulwark
Tonight on #SimplePolitics, Bill Kristol and I have an in-depth conversation about Impeachment, what‘s next for ...
ICYMI: We got Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s first majority opinion today.
SCOTUS rules against immigrant who has lived in the US without authorization for decades. The gov't sought to deport him based on a state misdemeanor conviction (he used a fake Social Security card to get a job). SCOTUS says 5-3 he's not eligible to seek protection from removal.
NEW: In Freedom of Information Act case, SCOTUS says federal government does not have to disclose documents that were produced as part of a rulemaking on "cooling water intake structures" under the Clean Water Act. The Sierra Club argued the docs should be disclosed under FOIA.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, March 4 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, March 4, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
SCOTUS will hear oral argument at 10:00 a.m. EST about when claimants must raise claims in the administrative process – “exhausting” their administrative remedies. Read more from Ronald Mann.
It might sound exhausting! But we claim it might be fun.
Justices to weigh issue exhaustion for Social Security claimants - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Carr v. Saul involves a surprisingly basic question of administrative law: when claimants ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.