Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12-296 | 9th Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2012 |
Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that 38 U.S.C. § 511, which provides that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs “shall decide all questions of law and fact necessary to a decision by the Secretary under a law that affects the provision of benefits,” and that “the decision of the Secretary as to any such question shall be final and conclusive and may not be reviewed by any other official or by any other court,” precludes the district court’s jurisdiction over systemic challenges to the United States Department of Veterans Affairs’ failures to provide timely medical benefits and to timely resolve claims for service-connected death and disability benefits.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jul 19 2012 | Application (12A78) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 5, 2012 to September 5, 2012, submitted to Justice Kennedy. |
Jul 24 2012 | Application (12A78) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until September 5, 2012. |
Sep 5 2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 10, 2012) |
Oct 4 2012 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 9, 2012. |
Oct 10 2012 | Brief amici curiae of National Veterans Legal Services Program, et al. filed. |
Oct 10 2012 | Brief amicus curiae of Veterans Law Committee of the Delaware State Bar Association filed. |
Nov 1 2012 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including November 30, 2012. |
Nov 30 2012 | Brief of respondents Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, et al. in opposition filed. |
Dec 11 2012 | Reply of petitioners Veterans for Common Sense, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Dec 12 2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 4, 2013. |
Jan 7 2013 | Petition DENIED. |
Apparently all the action today at #SCOTUS was not limited to opinion announcements at 10 am. Major new cert. petition filed today challenging Harvard admissions policy. https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1364962610177843210
NEW: Supreme Court asked to outlaw race-based college admissions. Group challenging Harvard admissions policy says it files appeal asking court to over 2003 Grutter decision.
SCOTUS rules against a college student who tried to sue police officers after they mistook him for a criminal suspect and tackled/beat him. The unanimous ruling involves a technical interpretation of the "judgment bar" under the Federal Tort Claims Act. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-546_7mip.pdf
We're LIVE now. Opinions in 13 minutes. Come chat with us while we wait.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Join us! https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/02/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-feb-25/
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Feb. 25 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, Feb. 25, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
www.scotusblog.com
Will the Supreme Court make a bright-line rule allowing police officers to conduct warrantless home searches when in “hot pursuit” for a misdemeanor?
Read @AHoweBlogger’s takeaway from the oral argument today.
Justices hear argument on whether “hot pursuit” for misdemeanors allows police to enter home without a warrant - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in the case of Arthur Lange, a northern California man convicte...
www.scotusblog.com
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.