|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-719||8th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issue: Whether it violates the First Amendment to appoint a labor union to represent and speak for public-sector employees who have declined to join the union.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 04 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 3, 2019)|
|Dec 12 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Kathleen Uradnik, and Respondents St. Cloud State University and the Board of Trustees of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities.|
|Dec 28 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Competitive Enterprise Institute filed.|
|Jan 02 2019||Waiver of right of respondent Inter Faculty Organization to respond filed.|
|Jan 02 2019||Waiver of right of respondents St. Cloud State University and Board of Trustees of the MN State Colleges and Universities to respond filed.|
|Jan 03 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Scholars filed.|
|Jan 03 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation filed.|
|Jan 03 2019||Brief amici curiae of Public Policy Research Organizations and Advocacy Groups filed.|
|Jan 09 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.|
|Jan 25 2019||Response Requested. (Due February 25, 2019)|
|Jan 31 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 25, 2019 to March 27, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 04 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 27, 2019, for all respondents.|
|Feb 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.|
|Feb 22 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Goldwater Institute filed.|
|Feb 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute and Yankee Institute filed.|
|Feb 25 2019||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Freedom Foundation.|
|Mar 27 2019||Brief of respondent Inter Faculty Organization in opposition filed.|
|Mar 27 2019||Brief of respondents St. Cloud State University and Board of Trustees of the MN State Colleges and Universities in opposition filed.|
|Apr 10 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.|
|Apr 10 2019||Reply of petitioner Kathleen Uradnik filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 29 2019||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Freedom Foundation GRANTED.|
|Apr 29 2019||Petition DENIED.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.