|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-7||1st Cir.||Apr 19, 2016||Jun 16, 2016||8-0||Thomas||OT 2015|
Holding: (1) The implied false certification theory can be a basis for liability under the False Claims Act when a defendant submitting a claim makes specific representations about the goods or services provided, but fails to disclose non-compliance with material statutory, regulatory, or contractual requirements that make those representations misleading with respect to those goods or services; and (2) liability under the FCA for failing to disclose violations of legal requirements does not turn upon whether those requirements were expressly designated as conditions of payment.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on June 16, 2016.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 30 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 31, 2015)|
|Jul 14 2015||Waiver of right of respondents United States and Massachusetts, ex rel. Julio Escobar and Carmen Correa to respond filed.|
|Jul 29 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.|
|Aug 4 2015||Response Requested . (Due September 3, 2015)|
|Aug 18 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 5, 2015.|
|Oct 5 2015||Brief of respondents United States and Massachusetts, ex rel. Julio Escobar and Carmen Correa in opposition filed.|
|Oct 20 2015||Reply of petitioner Universal Health Services, Inc. filed.|
|Oct 21 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 6, 2015.|
|Nov 9 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 13, 2015.|
|Nov 16 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 24, 2015.|
|Nov 30 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 4, 2015.|
|Dec 4 2015||Petition GRANTED limited to Questions 2 & 3 presented by the petition.|
|Jan 8 2016||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Jan 19 2016||Joint appendix filed. (Two Volumes) (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Jan 19 2016||Brief of petitioner Universal Health Services, Inc. filed.|
|Jan 25 2016||Brief amici curiae of American Health Care Association and the National Center for Assisted Living filed.|
|Jan 25 2016||Brief amicus curiae of CareSource filed.|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amicus curiae of CTIA-The Wireless Association filed.|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of American Hospital Association, et al. filed.|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of Interested Healthcare Providers filed.|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities filed.|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, et al. filed.|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Generic Pharmaceutical Association filed.|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Coalition for Government Procurement filed.|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Joliet, Inc. filed.|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of American Medical Association, et al. filed.|
|Feb 9 2016||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including February 25, 2016.|
|Feb 25 2016||Brief of respondents United States and Massachusetts, ex rel. Julio Escobar and Carmen Correa filed.|
|Mar 2 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Joel D. Hesch filed.|
|Mar 3 2016||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.|
|Mar 3 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Professor David Freeman Engstrom filed.|
|Mar 3 2016||Brief amicus curiae of National Whistleblower Center filed.|
|Mar 3 2016||Brief amici curiae of the Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, et al. filed.|
|Mar 3 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Taxpayers Against Fraud Education Fund filed.|
|Mar 3 2016||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Mar 3 2016||Brief amicus curiae of AARP filed.|
|Mar 3 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Mark McGrath filed.|
|Mar 3 2016||Brief amici curiae of States of Illinois, et al. filed.|
|Mar 3 2016||Brief amicus curiae of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts filed.|
|Mar 3 2016||Brief amici curiae of Law Professors and Senior Lecturers of Law filed.|
|Mar 3 2016||Brief amicus curiae of U.S. Senator Charles E. Grassley filed.|
|Mar 4 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 19, 2016|
|Mar 14 2016||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit.|
|Mar 15 2016||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 21 2016||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Mar 28 2016||Reply of petitioner Universal Health Services, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 6 2016||Record received from U.S.D.C. District of Massachusetts. The record is electronic and located on PACER with the exception of SEALED documents received in 1 Envelope.|
|Apr 6 2016||Record received from U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of the Joint Appendix contained in 1 envelope.|
|Apr 19 2016||Argued. For petitioner: Roy T. Englert, Jr., Washington, D. C. For respondents: David C. Frederick, Washington, D. C.; and Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae).|
|Jun 16 2016||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jul 18 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
|Aug 19 2016||Record from U.S.D.C. District of Massachusetts has been returned.|
|Aug 19 2016||Record from U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit has been returned.|
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.